| 16 September 2002: Moot |
||
|
Considering what a constant presence and pervasive influence aikido is in my life, I sure don't write about it much. Today, though, I had occasion to do so, on the Moot, my Pack's ongoing open-topic email discussion group. Every now and then, I post something to the Moot that I think is worth hanging onto, for future reference and/or for future reading by those not on the Moot. I usually don't actually get around to hanging onto whatever it is, but today it occurred to me that I could just paste it into this journal. So
anyway, a fellow aikidoka on the Moot today remarked that "Trickery
is central to aikido," meaning that aikido is an art that allows
one to take down big burly attackers by outwitting them. Which is true
enough at a superficial level, but there are enough aikidoka on the Moot
that I figured we didn't need to limit ourselves to that level. Trickery is central
to every martial art, combat sport, and effective streetfighting
technique. As soon as one gets more sophisticated than "stand
toe to toe and take turns hitting each other until someone falls down,"
one is into the realm of trickery. Can you imagine how lame and
useless boxing and fencing would be if it was against the rules to feint?
How about a judo or karate style where it was against the rules to try
to do anything that might catch your opponent by surprise?
(Remember, kids, Anti-Spam Chimp says, "Track down those spammers and cut their fingers off with bolt cutters so they can't hit the Send button anymore.")
|
||