| 4 January 2004: Resolution (Excerpts from Email) |
||
Text in this font is by me, as usual. Civilian names changed to kennings, as usual. Read my previous entry first.
• • •
There is, indeed a lot more in my journal. I've finally become prolific. I'm in the midst of a very powerful and transformative ritual lab, which started in late November, and I've been chronicling every single session. I hope you'll check it out - that's what it's there for.
I admit to the occasional indulgence in sarcasm. I confess that I rather enjoyed it. That's one of the perks of having ceded all claim to the moral high ground. I figured you could handle it, and that you'd probably recognize it as merely being the last bit of residual venting I needed to do around our conflict. Glad to see I was right.
Jesus, Tom, I know that. I'm not letting you win because I think you're some kind of infantile petty tyrant who needs to always be right; I'm letting you win to make sure that I'm not being some kind of infantile petty tyrant who needs to always be right.
Well, good, since it's what I'm doing. It's fun. And I even give you permission to do it, too - along with anyone who reads this when I put it up in my journal. Not that you need my permission, any more than I need yours - but it couldn't hurt. You don't even have to send me money or anything, though I wouldn't mind it if you did.
I have no doubt but that you're telling the truth; it's by no means an alien perspective that I need to "consider." And I think it's been obvious from the start that our conflict was rooted in misunderstanding. As a firm believer in the aphorism "to understand all is to forgive all," I'd be pretty darn flummoxed if it turned out to not be a misunderstanding. In case it got lost in all the sarcasm last time, the essence of my solution to our conflict is this: since all our conflict is rooted in our frequent inability to understand one other, I have decided to simply agree with your understanding, and to refrain from attempting to convince you of mine, thus making the whole understanding/misunderstanding polarity largely irrelevant to our friendship. I love you and I enjoy hanging out with you and collaborating with you. The only time things are less than glorious between us is when we misunderstand each other and get into a cycle of mutual frustration over it. That won't happen anymore, because I won't participate in it anymore. I'm fine with any understanding of me that you choose to express, and will cheerfully agree with it, as long as it's not expressed through hitting me with a bat or something. I believe that to understand all is to forgive all, but it hasn't proven to be especially helpful to us, because we've kept getting stuck in the understanding part. So what I'm doing is skipping straight to the forgiving part. Understanding seems to take a lot of time and trouble and effort; I'm finding that forgiving, these days, takes none at all.
Indeed I may. But for the reasons explained above, it doesn't matter - your opinions and beliefs about me are a non-issue to me now.
Again, it's a non-issue. However, to the part of me that is still concerned about my public image, this assurance does come as a great relief, seeing as how I've already publicly announced that everything you believe about me is true.
True. But once again,
a non-issue now.
It seems to me that our conflict stemmed from my disagreeing with your opinion of me, which is why I've now ceased all such disagreement. But I never once thought that you were intentionally lying about your opinion of me, and I apologize if I've ever chosen my words so poorly as to give you that impression. What I'm learning here is how to be friends with someone whose opinion of me is not what I want it to be, without needing to try to change that opinion. This is a good thing to be learning. On the other hand, I have no interest whatsoever in being friends with someone who actually lies about me. I've had a few experiences with that over the years - very few, fortunately (Broken Wind was the most recent, and that was more than three years ago, and the last time before that was over a decade ago). Although I've become more forgiving of such people in recent years, I certainly don't go out of my way to continue my friendships with them. I know the difference between "perspectives that differ from mine," and "lies," and, no matter how much your words have pissed me off over the years, I've always known that they fit squarely into the former category.
Non-issue or not, I certainly don't mind hearing that.
Neither do I. I was lying. Does that make me a horrible person?
Of course we do, silly. Being friends IS spiritual work.
Another aphorism dear to my heart is Niels Bohr's statement, "There are great Truths and trivial truths. the opposite of a trivial truth is plainly false. The opposite of a great Truth is also true." I'd say that "Spiritual work connotes fixing things" is a fine example of a great Truth.
As you wish. My previous letter was, essentially, a declaration on my part that you're entirely welcome to judge me as much as you like, and that I won't take offense at your judgments. But if you choose not to take advantage of the offer, that's fine by me too.
You have interpreted me correctly.
Then I eagerly look forward to much enjoyable time in your company in the new year.
|
||